AI Achievement Interview
Turn one short conversation into a story your work can tell
What it is
A review system that asks what you actually did — by voice — and then scores everyone with the same ruler. A 1–2 minute core interview, one question at a time.
Three steps, one loop: voice confirmation (name · department · project) → highlight extraction (facts · artefacts · to be confirmed) → unified scoring (six-dimension total · ranked results).
Two ways to take part, both feeding the same candidate queue, the same transcription pipeline and the same six-dimension scoring:
- On site — staff record from a desktop dashboard while ChatGPT Voice on a phone handles the questions and adaptive follow-ups
- Remote, self-serve — start straight from the web, no admin-issued link and no ChatGPT client required; if the realtime service falters it falls back to a standard six-question mode
You can re-record as many times as you like before submitting (it costs nothing), and after a formal submission you can still redo the interview, up to 3 times total — the latest recording, transcript and score count, while every previous recording, realtime Q&A log and action record is kept.
Why build it
Two failure modes dominate achievement reviews: the smooth talker wins, and plans get counted as results.
The three hard rules exist for exactly that — don’t grade eloquence; don’t count plans as results; score every project with the same model, the same prompt and the same weights, with no manual adjustment this round.
The interview itself isn’t a fixed question bank but a method for talking about outcomes: the AI decides whether to clarify, chase the event, chase the change or chase the boundary based on your answer, taking the shortest path to one real event + one inspectable piece of evidence + one question still open. What already happened, what you think about it and what comes next are recorded separately, and anything thin is explicitly marked “to be confirmed”.
How to use it
Open openagent.world on a laptop or phone → enter your real name, department and the project’s formal name → allow the microphone and talk to the AI host → listen back, and submit only when you’re happy.
The site also carries the pre-interview checklist, the scoring rules and a system architecture page — recording, transcript, highlights, score and report all share one candidate-project identifier, so nothing scatters and no project gets mismatched.
Good for: organisations that need to compare dozens or hundreds of projects in a short window, without the outcome depending on who presents best.